During a meeting that took place in Bucharest, October 8-14, with Andreea Căpitănescu, Bojana Cvejic, Valentina De Piante, Jan Kopp, Jennifer Lacey, Jan Ritsema, a few points crystallized on the question: “What is the ideal education in choreography that we can imagine?”. I will try to write down what I retained from them, and this will probably imply my own preferences.
In what ways would an artistic education be different from the model described above? I will summarize the answer point by point.
n An education of “makers”. They are making their own work and supporting the work of others as performers and various kinds of collaborators.
n All consolidated knowledge or expertise is offered as optional, “elective”, and the authority linked with the expertise is transparent. I am thinking of this as resources mobilized according to the interests and needs of the makers. There are no mandatory courses.
n Two principles underlie the ideology of this school. All that matters is the attitude of the teachers, their capacity to decenter from their own preferences (taste, knowledge, experience, expertise) and at the same time, although it may seem contradictory to what has just been said, their passion or enthusiasm about what they do. Or more precisely, these teachers are enthusiastic about learning, and the process of learning for the students is about learning how to learn. The school is not a “formation-machine”, which should nourish the future artist with all the knowledge they will need for ever, to start their careers, or to be contemporary in three years… A school trains abilities to learn, and the independence an artist needs in order not to compromise, but to genuinely create.
n In addition to the dance specific workshops, the techniques of other arts are available: image and sound editing, an emphasis on new technologies, media and tools of expression.
n Theory is approached from the same spirit as the movement study: in practice and research.
n The school is organized as a collective practice where peer-to-peer exchange is as important as, or even more than, teacher-student relationship. The school should be as much as possible governed by a community of equals, students and teachers.
n Ideally, evaluation should be immanent to the process of making, learning and sharing everything with everyone. This is rarely possible, that where one is, is evident, and needs no judgment from the outside. But if reports should be done, then
Bojana CVEJIC
- Articole in legatura
- Teaching The Teachers - Educaţia artistică azi

